Top 5 Reasons Why Critics Hate The ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s’ Movie

by Barbara

The highly anticipated “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie, based on the wildly popular video game franchise, has finally hit theaters. Fans of the game, which involves surviving the night in a pizzeria haunted by animatronic monsters, have been eagerly awaiting its big screen adaptation. However, despite the franchise’s strong fan base and the film’s commercial success, critics have not been kind. Here are the top five reasons why critics hate the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie.

1. Weak Storyline and Plot Development

One of the primary criticisms of the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie is its weak storyline and poor plot development. The game’s narrative, while intriguing, is notoriously sparse and ambiguous, relying heavily on player interpretation and piecing together lore from various hidden clues. Translating this into a coherent and engaging movie plot has proven to be a significant challenge.


Critics argue that the film’s plot feels disjointed and underdeveloped, failing to provide the depth and complexity that fans might expect. Instead of expanding on the mysterious lore of the game, the movie tends to gloss over important plot points, leaving viewers confused and dissatisfied. The narrative lacks the necessary tension and intrigue to keep audiences engaged, often resulting in a sluggish pace that undermines the film’s potential for suspense and horror.


Moreover, the film’s attempt to balance fan service with a coherent storyline often falls flat. While the inclusion of iconic characters and references to the game is appreciated by die-hard fans, it does little to enhance the story for general audiences or critics, who find the plot lacking in originality and cohesion.


2. Uninspired Directing and Cinematography

Directing and cinematography play crucial roles in horror films, where creating the right atmosphere and visual tension is essential. Unfortunately, critics have panned the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie for its uninspired directing and lackluster cinematography.

The director’s approach to the material seems pedestrian, failing to bring any fresh or innovative perspectives to the horror genre. The film relies heavily on clichéd horror tropes and jump scares, which feel more formulaic than genuinely frightening. This lack of creativity extends to the cinematography, which critics describe as bland and unimaginative. The visual style lacks the distinctiveness needed to make the haunted pizzeria setting truly come alive, often resulting in scenes that feel static and uninspired.

Critics also point out the poor use of lighting and shadow, which are crucial in creating suspense and fear in horror films. Instead of utilizing these elements to build a creepy and oppressive atmosphere, the film often feels too brightly lit and devoid of the dark, foreboding ambiance that fans of the game expect.

See also: Is Five Nights At Freddy’s Safe For Kids?

3. Subpar Performances and Character Development

Another major point of contention among critics is the subpar performances and lack of character development in the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie. The game’s minimalistic approach to character backstory and development poses a significant challenge for filmmakers attempting to flesh out these elements for a cinematic audience.

The cast, while featuring some recognizable names, delivers performances that critics describe as wooden and uninspired. Characters come across as one-dimensional, lacking the depth and complexity needed to make their struggles and fears relatable. This issue is exacerbated by the film’s inadequate script, which fails to provide the actors with meaningful dialogue or compelling character arcs.

The protagonist’s journey, in particular, is criticized for being underwhelming and poorly defined. Viewers struggle to connect with or root for the main character, which diminishes the film’s emotional impact and engagement. The supporting characters fare no better, often reduced to mere plot devices or cannon fodder for the animatronic antagonists.

4. Overreliance on Fan Service

While fan service can be a powerful tool in adaptations, too much of it can alienate broader audiences and detract from the film’s overall quality. Critics argue that the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie suffers from an overreliance on fan service, which ultimately undermines its effectiveness as a standalone horror film.

The movie is filled with references and Easter eggs that fans of the game will undoubtedly recognize and appreciate. However, these nods often feel forced and shoehorned into the narrative, disrupting the flow of the story and confusing viewers who are not familiar with the game’s lore. This overemphasis on catering to the fan base comes at the expense of crafting a cohesive and engaging plot that can stand on its own merits.

Critics also note that the film’s attempt to cram as many elements from the game into its runtime results in a cluttered and disjointed narrative. The focus on fan service detracts from the necessary character development and plot progression, leaving the movie feeling more like a series of disconnected scenes rather than a unified story.

5. Lack of Genuine Horror and Suspense

At its core, the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” franchise is known for its ability to create a tense and terrifying atmosphere. Unfortunately, critics argue that the movie fails to capture the essence of what made the game so frightening, resulting in a lack of genuine horror and suspense.

The film’s overreliance on jump scares is a major point of criticism. While jump scares can be effective when used sparingly, their overuse quickly becomes predictable and loses its impact. Critics lament the missed opportunity to build a slow-burning, atmospheric horror that relies on psychological tension rather than cheap scares.

Furthermore, the animatronic antagonists, which are central to the franchise’s horror, are not utilized to their full potential. Critics argue that the film fails to convey the eerie and menacing presence of these characters, often resorting to CGI effects that lack the tangible creepiness of practical effects. This diminishes the overall scare factor and leaves audiences feeling more annoyed than terrified.

The pacing of the movie also contributes to its lack of suspense. With a sluggish start and a rushed climax, the film struggles to maintain a consistent level of tension. Critics point out that the best horror films build suspense gradually, leading to a satisfying and terrifying payoff. In contrast, the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie feels uneven and disjointed, never quite achieving the level of fear and tension that fans of the game expect.


While the “Five Nights at Freddy’s” movie has undoubtedly succeeded in attracting a large audience, particularly among fans of the game, it has failed to win over critics. The weak storyline, uninspired directing, subpar performances, overreliance on fan service, and lack of genuine horror have all contributed to the film’s poor reception. For a franchise that thrives on its ability to terrify and intrigue, these shortcomings are particularly disappointing. Despite its flaws, the movie’s commercial success suggests that there is still a passionate fan base eager to see their favorite game come to life on the big screen. However, for the series to achieve critical acclaim, future installments will need to address these issues and strive for a higher standard of storytelling and cinematic quality.

Related topics:

7 Steps To Play Five Nights At Freddy

Decoding the Enigma: Understanding Five Nights at Freddy’s Ending

Mega Cat Studios and Scott Cawthon Team Up for New Retro FNAF Game


You may also like


Rnada is a movie portal. The main columns include trailers, movie reviews, celebrities, movie knowledge, news

Copyright © 2023